Editorial take
Why it stands out
ToolJet is strongest when the team likes the internal-tools category but wants a more AI-forward product shape without giving up deployment flexibility.
Loading
Tool profile
AI-native internal app builder with builder-based pricing, a free tier, and both cloud and self-hosted deployment options.
Internal apps and business tooling
ToolJet is a useful addition because it sits in the same real buyer conversation as Retool, Appsmith, and Budibase while bringing its own AI-native angle and deployment flexibility. It is built for internal apps and business tooling, but it increasingly differentiates through AI-assisted app generation and credits rather than just classic low-code components. That makes it especially relevant for teams evaluating how much AI they actually want inside the internal-tools workflow.
Its pricing shape is builder-centric. ToolJet Cloud currently shows Free at $0 per builder with 2 builders, 50 end users, and 2 apps. Starter is $19 per builder per month, Pro is $79 per builder, Team is $199 per builder, and Enterprise is custom. Those plans vary meaningfully on end-user counts, apps, AI credits, and governance features. ToolJet is therefore not just a cheaper Retool clone; it is a different value model that rewards teams who can predict builder activity clearly.
Quick fit
Editorial take
ToolJet is strongest when the team likes the internal-tools category but wants a more AI-forward product shape without giving up deployment flexibility.
What it does well
Primary use cases
Fit notes
Compare with
Pressure-test this pick against nearby alternatives.
Pricing snapshot
ToolJet Free is $0 per builder per month with 2 builders, 50 end users, and 2 apps. Starter is $19 per builder per month, Pro is $79 per builder, Team is $199 per builder, and Enterprise is custom. ToolJet's plans also vary by app count, end-user limits, and included AI credits.
AgentOps
Free planAgent observability
Observability for AI agents with tracing, debugging, session visibility, and production monitoring.
Closer to agent observability than to model hosting or prompt tooling
